Replying to Avatar fiatjaf

Yes, I've seen similar ideas suggested before, but I think this is broken in many levels, for example: it's ugly, lacks flexibility, commoditizes relays and centralizes implementations, it's annoying for everybody involved, people can't change their minds after publishing.
Avatar
Girino Vey! 10mo ago

if the event is replaceable, they can change their mind. just replace with new rules.

it is still centralized in the sense you need to trust the relay to enforce this properly. I'm looking for ideas on how to implement this in a relay independent manner, completely decentralized. but couldn't figure out how yet.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
fiatjaf 10mo ago

Stop trying to be independent of relays.

Avatar
Girino Vey! 10mo ago

i'm not, i just don't want to trust them to do anything beyond being the backbone of the network. i'm not trusting them to make privacy decisions in my place if i can enforce those decisions with cryptography or a well designed protocol.