This note confuses me because it focuses on the past actions by the sender of the message (video below) instead of recognizing that he comes from a place of logic and rationale. You don’t have to forget that he contributed to censoring. But he did a 180, why stand in the way of that?

Or do you disagree with the message nostr:npub1lrjgpa9m2dl6esdah5pq7m005ymwh4glq4aet76q2zlz2f83esfsa2zvrj ? I doubt you do. https://video.nostr.build/1120f3dff6289cdfc547d18ff3df332cd5b60dedaba3cc2d3942f710ef9cde09.mp4 nostr:note1yjfcmddcxe6at8tg9nfe5q3ks06u7tjp5q0dc46crxpw0ytryq9ss9sqng