Replying to Avatar π–‹π–Žπ–†π–™π–‰π–Šπ–“π–Žπ–Šπ–— (Β―`◕‿◕´¯)

Long term as in 100 years not 2 days πŸ˜†
Avatar
Humble Bitcoiner 2y ago

Sure agree on that

You against this or what are your thoughts? Happy to learn more about this stuff

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
π–‹π–Žπ–†π–™π–‰π–Šπ–“π–Žπ–Šπ–— (Β―`◕‿◕´¯) 2y ago

For now it is harmful because we don’t have wide enough lightning adoption. If we can get to 1M BTC lightning capacity, then we won’t need to settle on the base layer that much.

Avatar
Humble Bitcoiner 2y ago

But doesn’t this push the development and awareness of lightning?

It might be a good warning call, no?

Avatar
π–‹π–Žπ–†π–™π–‰π–Šπ–“π–Žπ–Šπ–— (Β―`◕‿◕´¯) 2y ago

Yeah. But it is hard enough to get normies to run a node let alone his own lightning channels. We are still so early. 😁