Replying to Avatar redneonglow

nostr:npub1f8ledq6ja34pn4504vdzzlrv70cu63hvzz5tka229prma42c677qkk7frq nostr:npub1k439hg30ejgjcmfkayq5apl3hv3jg5zghfkpgdtz4eclzcfz4x3sfv6hs3 nostr:npub1qq7hl5sl6z0l0ahk8f6a4uv5mkvlama7dyvucdmtwdva2zg24xnqyafedr I'm worried that after Richard Stallman dies, trannies and SJW woketards will try and make an ethical source GPLv4, e.g. "you can't use GPL software for hateful purposes" which is just a leftist codeword to ban conservatives and Christians from using GPL software, and organizations such as pro-life crisis pregnancy centers would be barred from large amounts of commonly used software.

nostr:npub1f8ledq6ja34pn4504vdzzlrv70cu63hvzz5tka229prma42c677qkk7frq nostr:npub1k439hg30ejgjcmfkayq5apl3hv3jg5zghfkpgdtz4eclzcfz4x3sfv6hs3 nostr:npub1qq7hl5sl6z0l0ahk8f6a4uv5mkvlama7dyvucdmtwdva2zg24xnqyafedr I used to listen to some of the No Agenda podcasts back when I had more free time, and I remember one episode of one of them discussed some of the ethical source licenses and all the groups which were forbidden to use the software, among them being companies involved in fossil fuels and military contractors.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.