The sea ice extent in antarctica is not less than 43 years ago.
The false environmental scare business rooted in U.N. Agenda 21 (+ Agenda 2030) policy documents is the real threat to humanity as a species.
Discussion
What’s so bad about Agenda 21?
I can recommend Rosa Koire's book "Behind the Green Mask - U.N. Agenda 21" from 2011.
Basically, the U.N. Agenda 21 is a comprehensive central planning plan for the 21st century that was signed by 179 nations in Rio De Janeiro in 1992.
Agenda 21 comes with milestones and the next milestone is Agenda 2030.
To summarize, it is a totalitarian hodge-podge of fascism/communism justified on false climate alarmism propaganda.
Are you familiar with the “green” plan for South America to monetize their forests and shuttle binding development contracts to their buddy companies?
Check out this article on Bitcoin Magazine: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/debt-from-above-the-carbon-credit-coup?utm_source=carrot&utm_medium=partner&utm_campaign=carrot_share
Good article.
Carbon credits, ESG scores and Net Zero inititatives are common features of the U.N. Agenda 21.
It started with the Club of Rome looking for an approach to justify global governance (supra-national regulations) and came to the conclusion that climate was a perfect pretext.
According to Club of Rome, the planet can sustain 1-2 billion people and possibly 8 billion "if we have a strong dictatorship". We passed 8 billion people in 2022-2023 depending on how we measure. According to their ideology, the planet can only sustain the current world population if we live under a dictatorship.
These ideas are reflected in the U.N. Agenda 21 + 2030. The only path for the U.N. to implement their 2030 goals, since most people will reject them, is via surveillance, digital ID, CBDC, social credit scores, censorship, property confiscation and border control.
Thankfully they can't control Bitcoin. Capital and entrepreneurs will move where there is more freedom and less totalitarianism, exercising liberty arbitrage.