Cc nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx nostr:npub1saxmd5km0vusxhl84tqeaqaysftezh3h6ne22h95efntutth42yqlju5fv nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy
Discussion
maybe it's confidential information that isn't disclosed in public filings...
Then why announce it?
The equity holders are all named in the filings, no? There's a full cap table in there. If the answer is that Ten31 was an LP in one of the named equity holder entities in the filings, that'd be a logical explanation, and would keep deal data generally private, because I wouldn't be able to tell how many shares Ten31 owned, or what their cost basis was, or when the investment took place. Though it still wouldn't explain the timeline of GRIID predating Ten31 while being exclusively backed by Ten31.
Your non answer, however, is a lot stranger.