Replying to Avatar ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ

i'm not talking about WoT blocking, per se, but i think it should be the same... just because someone you follow reacts to some stuff that is obviously either muted by you or outside of your circle doesn't mean it's interesting, quite to the contrary

but you could make an argument for the idea that a follow liking an event makes its WoT filter relax some amount based on that person's distance in the graph, not necessarily gonna reveal it, so either way it's hidden

it's not hidden if you can see it, idk why that isn't plain and simple to understand

putting a revealer in there provokes the curiosity, it should just be gone

and the same shit for how so many "hiding" implementations work... they run AFTER the hidden content is added to the DOM, like, what the fuck, again, glitching makes curiosity, i honestly have not changed my mind about almost anyone i have ever blocked, to the point where after a few times resetting my mute list i won't do that again, my curiosity is burned out

Avatar
Diacone Frost 1y ago

I agree. Still think it should be a choice (like the idea of graph distance btw.)

Anyway, I saw some really funny replies to *eplyGuy/girl because of this "feature"

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.