On Work

----------

Work is a necessary inconvenience. In contemporary society, however, people are working harder than ever before, prioritizing their careers over aspects of life that were traditionally valued. These include family, the pursuit of knowledge, artistic creation, and other enriching activities. The emphasis on career advancement has become so pervasive that it has overshadowed other fulfilling pursuits, leading to an obsession with societal approval as measured by financial success.

Under this perspective, true wealth implies the freedom not to work, a metric by which many are impoverished in our current economy. This notion of poverty is particularly evident in countries like China, Japan, and Korea, where the work ethic is exceptionally intense. In these cultures, not working has become stigmatized to the point that it is viewed as a failure. This shift in societal values has been especially pronounced for women, many of whom now prioritize their careers over starting a family or cultivating a nurturing home environment.

Such a shift in priorities since 1971 is declared by the people in power as a sign of progress or empowerment. From a strictly economic perspective, this paints a rather bleak picture, suggesting that we are more enslaved to our work than we might wish to acknowledge. The zeal with which we throw ourselves into our careers is often celebrated as a positive attribute, a reflection of personal ambition and dedication. But this view raises the question: What are we truly working toward?

It becomes a troubling issue when we realize that much of the work done today is not aimed at creating tangible value. Rather, it is often influenced by political considerations and rent-seeking behavior, where individuals or entities seek to increase their share of existing wealth without creating new wealth. This focus on extracting value rather than creating it leads to a hollow sense of achievement and a society that prioritizes the superficial markers of success over genuine fulfillment. At least the slaves of the past knew their predicament. The propaganda today is especially deceitful because most people can't even identify what's so unsatisfactory about their work and why they burn out.

In the end, this obsession with work and the pursuit of financial success is a presenting symptom of fiat money. We work harder than ever because it lets the rent-seekers continue in their rent-seeking. We work hard because our savings are continuously drained.

The current emphasis on work, driven by propaganda, calls for reflection on what we value. Yet that reflection is nearly impossible without some resources, and sadly, we don't have the savings to be able to reflect on what we really want. So we trudge on, running on the fiat treadmill.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

💯 so much emphasis on functionality in fiat work. Working harder and harder, competing to be more efficient and 'productive'. Vitality being squeezed out.

Like you say, so little time to stand back, stand still, and question why.

h/t Lukas Hauser for the painting.

⚡️

Too true.

Beautifully said Jimmy!

Love your work and “TG for Bitcoin”. For dyslexic people like me your posts are too long 😀. So I used a LLM to summarize -

Certainly! Here's a summarized version in bullet points:

- Work has overshadowed traditional values like family and personal growth.

- Intense work ethic prevalent in countries like China, Japan, and Korea.

- Women now prioritize careers over family due to societal shifts.

- Modern work often lacks tangible value, leaning towards wealth extraction.

- This shift in work values stems from the nature of fiat money.

- The focus on work prevents time for reflection and personal realization.

I'll record it on audio soon and release it as part of my podcast.

Indeed, since 1971 our government has continuously robbed us of the wealth we once had.

The same force has fueled thoughts such as escaping rat race (see Robert Kiyosaki's game titled 'Cashflow'), in which winning meant not having to work anymore. The vehicle is to stairstep assets using loans, presumably on a fractional reserve lending system.

The force of fiat currency and fractional reserves artificially enhances a few specific categories of investment: real estate, (big) businesses, and finance. In essence, if a bank can loan big sums for it, it can be highly profitable. This is a net loss for the individual, however, because it encourages continuously raising prices,

If inflation became practically zero (zero printing) and fractional reserve became outlawed, what might happen to the cost of a loan? In the short term, it would sky rocket, but in the long term an individual may actually be able to save for a home without the value of his savings crashing with the currency in which he saves.

We have an artificially short time preference, and that necessitates our continued hard work, while that work continues to be devalued.

#TGFB