If you understand the passage of time, that also implies they surrendered after the war was over, which makes sense given how dedicated they were to never surrendering

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Simplify it for me. your claim is that the nuking had no effects on the war whatsoever?

"War was already over" doesn't have much room left for simplification dawg, I don't even see what word can be removed anymore without losing the meaning

How do you infer when exactly the war was over. Share your process of thinking. Most people understood that Japan surrendered only after they declared it. Maybe you are smarter though.

Most people are indoctrinated and have no ability to do independent research.

Maybe. So tell me the results of your independent research. How would you act differently

Japan was US territory already

According to who?

Nothing like mass wiping civilians off the earth to end a war. Worked like a charm 🎁

It did though πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

Maybe try suggesting your ideas of better ways for ending a war next time

Japan had no resources to continue the war. The US was the major supplier of oil globally at the time, all they had to do was cut off Japan, which they never did though. The war ended with Hitler's army spread thin and freezing to death in the Russian winter, just like Napoleon's a century earlier.

Why did they surrender only exactly after the nuking in your opinion?

Your explanation seems a little hazey here but yeah Japan was pretty tapped out