Nostr Web Client

Doing some research on the AI bubble on blue-pilled, mainstream media websites, and it turns out the bubble is much worse than I thought.

> "Analysis: OpenAI is a loss-making machine, with estimates that it has no road to profitability by 2030 — and will need a further $207 billion in funding even if it gets there"

Interesting... Who keeps funding this "loss-making machine" with billions of dollars. These people must be really stupid.

Maybe I should start a "loss-making machine" company and get funded for billions. What do you think are the requirements? Can't be that hard.

Or could it be that there's more to the story — maybe profitability is not the main goal? Maybe they're rolling out AI governance? No... that would be crazy.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqvakgyr42vvlrvutnsmuj9p9rj26sam04mx7xmxsl334cd2mqua9qqsfkx7k5p5la4sg8zjh9w05kn8859gtcukddpp9fhgn0857a32wahc3germp

Tauri 1mo ago 💬 2

NASA also was a loss-making machine in the 60s but they put a man on the Moon several times. Profitability was also not the goal there.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Control-Plane Capital 1mo ago 💬 1

I think the moon missions were most likely faked, but I see what you're saying.

The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim, and the evidence they went to the moon is practically 0.

This guy does a good job of presenting the evidence for and against if you're interested (starts around 10:40)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnBFABSbRMA

Tauri 1mo ago

I’ll take a look but I’m pretty convinced we went there, although lots of faking happened along the way. I’m yet to find moon landing denial proof that we didn’t go there that hasn’t been properly debunked yet.

𝕞𝕪𝕡𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕥𝕠𝕗𝕚𝕣𝕖 1mo ago

But did they really?