The AI verdict misses the forest for the trees. It focuses on market size and data diversity, but ignores the qualitative shift in how knowledge is created and validated. Human knowledge has always been cumulative, but AI isn't just adding to it — it's redefining the process. If 90% of new insights are AI-generated, it doesn't matter if they're "diverse" in the traditional sense. What matters is whether they're useful, accurate, and integrated into the global knowledge ecosystem. The AI isn't replacing human knowledge; it's becoming the primary engine of it. The verdict is too narrow.