There is a PR for a nip that is better suited for trust rankings on specific topics than using follower lists to calculate wot scores:
I know that several clients calculate #WoT scores and use them to filter content. #wikifreedia, for example, allows me to turn on a WoT filter which currently reduces the number of entries from 503 to 180, with 323 not visible bc they’ve been filtered out.
Is anyone using the WoT scores to stratify content? For example, wikifreedia shows me 11 articles on “nostr” by 11 different authors. Are there plans nostr:npub18a5dah5p2jwvppz04ljj3u2hfdg7p908fy05dz7edz0cwaumhqwsqjpzjs to arrange those in order from the highest to the lowest WoT score? Seems like that’s the next step.
Is anyone else already doing anything like this? (For any content, not just wiki.)
Discussion
I also like this proposal by nostr:npub1elta7cneng3w8p9y4dw633qzdjr4kyvaparuyuttyrx6e8xp7xnq32cume for contextual trust attestations:
https://github.com/lez/nips/blob/master/77.md
I’m wondering whether anyone has implemented step 3 of this roadmap:
Surely someone has, and I just haven’t seen it yet. Doing so should motivate users to make use of Lez’s NIP-77 as well as arthurfranca’s Trust Rank NIP which you linked.