NIPs that pretend to do one thing and they don’t are harmful to nostr and innovation; it’s hard to identify this during the NIP process but we should work on bringing this when reality emerged its head.
NIP-26 is a good example but not the only one.
Discussion
Few understand.
What are the other ones? :) Now I am curious
Is NOP[e]s the opposite of NIPs?
I don't understand. It's there anything wrong with NIP-26?
I don't understand either but here's a link to it in case someone wants to provide a fresh perspective. https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/26.md
Yeah, I already read that NIP. But I can't find anything wrong.
Shots fired against NIP-32.
