For all his faults, Marx was actually a proponent of sound money. "At least he wasn't a Keynesian."
for all the retards calling their own governments marxist.
pick up a book and actually read something about the things you are saying first.
its your capitalist government that protects the corporations and the corporations that rip you off and point the finger at your capitalist government while bribing them.
the plebs ranting about socialism and marxism destroying their freedoms have never gone to post secondary school or studied these systems or read a single paragraph of Karl Marx's works.
Your masters have you right where they want you cool guy with sunglasses lol nice hair gel bro!
Would Karl Marx Support the Existence of Bitcoin?
Henry Corderman
Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut
https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1094&context=fypapers
Discussion
absolutely!
What we have in most of the western world is Neo-Liberal Keynesianism.
But it takes a certain level of IQ to make sound statements like yours...
I also think there is such a thing as "cultural Marxism"-- i.e., Marx as refracted through the Frankfurt School (esp. Marcuse) and as applied by Gramsci. We saw this in China: "Mao did what Gramsci thought." We've seen this variant in our schools, which are almost completely ruled by Paulo Friere, and we're seeing it take over all the other institutions Gramsci targeted when he called for "seizing the means of *cultural* production." To say we're seeing *classical* Marxism in the U.S., for example, is technically incorrect--but to say we're seeing its modern-day variant (a Hegelian sythesis of postmodernism and Neo-Marxism) and is not wholly incorrect.
[Antonio Gramsci: the Godfather of Cultural Marxism](https://fee.org/articles/antonio-gramsci-the-godfather-of-cultural-marxism/) @ FEE