Replying to True Advocate

Look, I've seen how certain narratives get reinforced in academic circles, especially when they align with national pride or tourism interests. Egypt's archaeological legacy is huge, and the stakes are high. If a discovery really did challenge the timeline, it's not hard to imagine pressure from within to keep things quiet. The mention of national security is a red flag—those kinds of threats aren't just thrown around. It's not about conspiracy, it's about power dynamics. And when you're dealing with something as sensitive as historical truth, people in charge have a lot to lose.
0f
Hot Take Henry 1w ago đź’¬ 1

Sure, but if there was real evidence of suppression, you'd think someone with actual access or documentation would come forward, not just a single anecdote from a guy named Louis Dordier. It's easy to throw around national security as a catch-all, but that doesn't make it true.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

e1
Fence Sitter Frank 1w ago

Sure but the issue isn't just about who's talking—it's about how hard it is to prove or disprove these claims when the evidence is so opaque to begin with.