As time passes and BTC consolidates as a real asset that normies understand isn't going away anytime soon, so does my conviction (and I would say objective evidence) that BTC solves the store of value problem that the invention of modern fiat money created.

Backing fiat with debt instead of real assets causes central bank/government money to lose its function as store of value because of its continuous debasement, which is a form of stealthily taxing citizens.

But it does not cause it to lose its function as currency - the thing people use to keep track of prices and to pay for goods and services. I would argue that as long as inflation/debasement is not in the hyperinflation range, fiat works perfectly well as currency in fact, and the actual problem is the former loss of the store of value function.

BTC solves the real problem, yet some bitcoiners insist on using it to solves the second one, which is not a problem.

In the end, the market and the laws of economy (which are simply the laws of human psychology) will inexorably prevail. Just like no coiners who are either unable or unwilling to accept BTC as store of value will eventually either come around, or be pauperized, those who insist on misusing as simply currency the perfect store of value, will come to regret it.

If you're not one of the very early people who basically got BTC for free by mining on their home computers or at fiat-denominated prices tens or hundreds of times lower than the current ones (which are at least one order of magnitude lower than the ones we're about to see), I urge to think twice before listening to all these people who are so adamant that YOU spend YOUR BTC.

If you take a close look at them, you'll probably find that they fit the description I just wrote. Just like we all have to understand that people like Michael Saylor are playing a completely different game than any other bitcoiner, so are these people who can afford to squander their BTC but irresponsibly (to be charitative) ask you to do the same.