Surely they'll pay on-chain
Discussion
Go pitch your idea. I'll start development when the transaction settles.
I'm not a developers, would they even listen? >.< but I'll definitely ask.
Don't you get it? Funding devs is easy. Raising funds is hard. If you can't raise funds or write code and maintain servers, don't bother with any proposals, they'll never be done.
Better idea: propose ideal functionality, having considered how it should work, as the basis for criticizing shitty dev work
Do you think the Nostr project overall wasted a lot of funding on shitty dev work?
Funding dev work this far into overshoot is always a waste that results in shitty quality. Good devs haven't worked for pay up front since like, Satoshi Nakamoto or so
Don't use the pseudonym. Unless you don't know the real names behind it. Then, lol hahah
Not many people believe me that it was Satoru Iwata
No. Adam Back and Hal Finny. And others who contributed to the code.
I don't see what makes you think that. Satoru Iwata seems much more likely
Do you know anything about hashcash and PGP? Just back away from this argument now. You have already demonstrated your ignorance in the field of cryptography.
I'll be nice and pretend I didn't notice you.
Satoru Iwata seems to have had a more utilitarian understanding of cryptography. Hashcash is too silly and pgp is too simple for either to be indicators of Bitcoin level genius. Satoshi's code also seems a little too clean for him to be more than 1 person
Hashcash is the first ref in the white paper. Style and structure analysis of the code base show that Finney as the closest match. He was also the one to made the first transaction.
Please, stop being retarded.
Why would you reference yourself first from a pseudonym?
Finney himself described Satoshi as someone else sending him that transaction, not himself, and I see Satoru Iwata style/structure in that code
Can you two stop fighting? If you wanna fight hash it over who had better software, code, security or design.