This is well intentioned, but completely wrong. When you take responsibility for the content, then YOU ARE responsible for it. If you people thnk that will appease State actors with bad ill against Nostr, you are absolutely dreaming.

There will always, invariably, inevitably be "bad" content that they will be able to use to go after people running relays -- if you accept that you are responsible for it.

The fight is to get court precedent overturning the ridiculous notion that a hosting service is responsible for the content someone else creates. Or at least, that a relay, which supposedly just RELAYS, is not responsible for what is relayed, like the it would make no sense to go after a town mayor because a criminal used the roads he ordered to build and is responsible to maintain.

Going down this path is short lived and will inevitable either kill the protocol, or allow bad actors (think Meta) to coopt it by pushing for ever-increasing regulation until they wash off all independent relay-runners and we're back to square one in the walled garden.

nostr:note1qp3xz9h5dpcnhjgmzsprvylfja60r7hcnmw00seet4lr4vryafuscqxgjj