Have you actually designed anything for bitcoin or nostr? Because if you had, you would understand the technical limitations that we’re dealing with.

Only people who don’t understand how bitcoin or nostr works cry about how bad the UX is.

It doesn’t take a genius to copy great UI / UX but it does take innovative breakthroughs and creativity to make it work within the bounds of technical constraints.

The reason all the shitcoins UX works is because it’s centralized and only decentralized in name.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Makes sense, not undermining the incredible work done here, I get that it’s a lot harder than pushing a centralized thing and worth the effort.

But as long as these limitations are here, there’s little designers can do and therefore there’s little reach of that technology leaps.

I remember hearing something about Primal using caching service which is basically a centralized server no? To keep it running smoothly for UX, kind of a compromise?

Id argue there is a lot that designers can do but few even bother trying. Proof of work!

Yes we have our limits to what we can do given the tech, but for nostr the sky is the limit. We can also inform better protocol design (nips) with our insights.

Roll up the sleeves and let’s get to it 💪