Probably too much but I think he is refering
to complete anonimity and that is not the way.
When you have nothing to lose because you hide behind anonimity, you give less weight to the things you share. And you have no value in keeping morals because you don't have a certain image to mantain.
Far different with pseudonymity. Where you still get to have a profile that is not directly associated with your real person but you still try to keep a reputation because of the value your pseudonym have.
He also had many professional colleagues privately tell him they completely agreed with him yet weren’t willing to stand up publicly and support him. He wouldn’t have lost his career if those colleagues had stood up when he first protested compelled speech.
Now, many western countries are passing laws that compel speech just like the one he became infamous for opposing.
The state of Michigan is also trying to pass such a law. Whether it withstands SCOTUS scrutiny is far too dependent on luck at this point than is acceptable.
There comes a time when the betrayal of Peter is as dangerous as the betrayal of Judas. I understand the value of anonymity, but I also understand very well the dangers that JP is talking about.
