Replying to Avatar Jameson Lopp

Backwards compatibility with regard to forks is taken from the perspective of a node operator rather than a transactor, but yes. Perhaps a new term is necessary.
Avatar
ODELL 2w ago πŸ’¬ 5

> a new term is necessary

yes

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Satosha 2w ago

Wait what? .. new term . ???

Like semiSoftHardFORK 😭😭😭

Avatar
xenonsky 2w ago πŸ’¬ 1

ah so that is the third software client software for bitcoin you're going for? hmm

all Saylor does is Saylor business

I am out.

Avatar
Sondre | satoshiconsult.com 1w ago

How about connecting a working LN-address, which will enable sovereigns to zap you freedom money?

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2w ago

can i come up with it? I’ll do my best.

Avatar
U-P-G-R-A-Y-E-D-D 2w ago

U-P-G-R-A-Y-E-D-D

69
Austin 2w ago

SotFard phork