totally get elons tight position

i still think elon would have gotten far more value just supporting open source things like nostr, keet, simplex etc

just look at the relatively small amount nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m gave and the results

at the end of the day we can grassroots this with bitcoin too tho the big names have helped immensely, we have hidden stars in the names that got things rolling like nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

he paid 41B for the user base

not for infrastructure, as twitter did not have its own servers - BTW, the dependency on Big Tech clouds is another leverage the deep state has over X

not for the code - most of the code was censorship, "trending", data mining and focused ads calculations.

not for the employees - he dismissed most of them.

From the beginning Musk declared to have big ambitions - not just tweets, a broad app with everything from blogs to shopping.

Did he believe the user base was the key to get quicker results?

He would have to create an open source + open protocol business model... Possible?

At the $$ scale Elon Musk would care about? What about other clients competing for users?

Heck, I am not even sure how many of the usual proprietary social networks are really profitable without selling user data and deep state subsides (there are very dark tales)

his stated goal or a goal was to preserve freespeech

the user base is not the biggest but influential

likely elon owning twitter will shift election, which may have been his real goal in which case there likely wasnt another choice

something like nostr will be far better for freespeech and probably an 'everything' app so if he is serious he will adopt similar, being the innovative engineer he is he would have to atleast explore p2p etc to cut server costs