Still no one citing a source about 90% of ULEZ cameras in London being cut down.

People will post any old bollocks if it’s an idea they like. I mean it would be fantastic if they had removed all the cameras in London, it’s one of the most surveilled cities on planet earth. However, there’s no evidence of that figure when you go to London. It’s very easy to spot ULEZ cameras, they’re all over the place.

Sorry to disappoint all the folks sharing the video. 90% is not the same as 25%. That’s not me saying that, it’s maths.

I’d be a lot better off if 90% of them had been destroyed. I actually have skin in this horse.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Everyone posting this bollocks should send zaps to those getting stung with ULEZ charges instead.

It’s tiresome isn’t it?

It’s the total number of sites and the percentage of sites functional over time that is important to understanding the actual impact. For example, if 90% of the sites in a network of 1000 sites had been put out of action once over three years, but each time a site had been repaired and back working within 2 days, it’s quite a different picture.

True indeed.