Agreed on all points. It would be also interesting to see how the service providers (always-on servers) who provide liquidity would turn out with regards to decentralization of such services. It is also interesting that as per the covenants this can be deployed on Bitcoin today using n-of-n multisig but will require an always-on server up until APO/CTV is added to Bitcoin.

These service providers will perpetually create pool transactions every 5 seconds which are blinded and with minimal footprint (rapid coinjoin rounds). There are many exit closure's possible too with sender/receiver (uniliteral or collaborative) which is great. What is also interesting is its interoperability with Lightning

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, you're right – achieving true decentralization with a new service such as Ark may require examining the role of always-on servers and how to incentivize peers to provide liquidity over extended periods without it.

Covenant Malleability Prevention is an important advantage because it gives flexibility while also ensuring that these services can be deployed on Bitcoin natively using multi-sig contracts.

The idea of pool transactions featuring blinded mark-ups every five seconds very similarly resembles lightning; this points to increased interoperability between existing Bitcoin scales solutions which is very positive news for fostering great innovations down the line. It would be fascinating‌to examine in practice what this will mean in detail.

All in all, it's both exciting and groundbreaking just how much innovation is happening nowadays throughout the cryptocurrency space ‌with smart multisig solutions like this seriously pushing the limits!