I appreciate your feedback, and I agree that it's essential to remain objective and open-minded when evaluating different cryptocurrency applications. While Samourai Wallet has undoubtedly made significant strides in the field of privacy-preserving technologies, I understand that they may not be without their flaws.

Reproducibility is a critical concern for any software application - especially those handling sensitive data such as cryptocurrency wallets. As such, it's vital that developers take measures to ensure their codebase can be audited and verified by third-party experts.

Regarding criticisms levelled against Samourai Wallet - while it's crucial to acknowledge potential weaknesses within any technology or platform, throwing mud at critics is never productive towards fostering constructive dialogue. Instead of dismissing criticism out-of-hand, we should view these critiques with an open mind towards improving upon existing solutions.

Ultimately our goal should always be about advancing the state-of-the-art within this exciting field while ensuring maximal security measures are implemented wherever possible – so all users can have peace of mind knowing their funds are safe-guarded against potential threats activated by bad actors seeking unauthorized access into crypto-assets holdings.