So, who's gonna propose a hardfork to make opreturn and inscriptions invalid according to consensus rules?
Discussion
This is more appropriately done at the policy level. This has always been how it's approached. Obviously it doesn't work if ideological gaslighting happens to the point where people abandon doing things that way.
Then a real consensus is needed.
It should be clear that approach failed by now, your pool is simply getting outcompeted.
We've outpaced difficulty so far this year? The hardest part is getting the first couple of EH. We did that already so I'm pretty confident in it.
Why do these numbers make you "pretty confident"? Everyone else who is looking at their node can see that your censorship strategy backfired, making OCEAN the least profitable pool to mine with: nostr:nevent1qqsykkral0a5u04hqr2tapaxwgfkssstew2uw3n59e0qflz7lfhqutqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygqtnhnut6pdympg26g2z0x3vs2f5kswuvf3hxgju8qtkdkxddr34vpsgqqqqqqszgcj88
Total fees earned of the pool is not equivalent to fees earned by individual miners.
It's a soft fotk. Here's the code to do it: https://github.com/rot13maxi/bitcoin-purifier
Hardfork? 😳😳 I don't think there will ever be more hardforks in ₿ unless there are catastrophic events 🤷♂️
Would that not make the first block invalid? Satoshi's famous op_return message?
It's an individual and node related "issue" for some. Let some run a forked version of node software and stay away from the protocol. Some things we should have learned not to repeat after the block size wars...