My captain.

I finally fixed that bug … which prevented you from being able to generate your grapevine.

And yes, turns out that still, your generated grapevine (with current settings) is pretty much useless because you don’t follow anybody.

https://grapevine.my/demo/4b5ebf446764e330644d4162924a86a73c5173098cbb00db0a690b097006a08e

Good test though. I look forward to having MORE options (event kinds) available so that people like you to can STILL generate a web of trust … even without follows.

What event kinds would YOU like to use as a baseline for web of trust?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

great question! I hope that kind 3 is deprecated in favor of named lists, but that brings its own challenge as some of my lists may designate lower quality profiles, but that may not be obvious to an outside observer. ultimately, I think recent interactions provide a better basis for calculating web of trust, but there is obviously more effort to implement that approach

I like “recent interactions” a lot … and fits well into our “pluggable” architecture … if you also know which kinds you wanna track?

And lists fit well also … we (will be able to) ingest rando lists from across your entire network to help generate a grapevine for certain “contexts” … and also we’ll be able to export as a list.

So your “named” nip 51 COULD be dynamically generated by grapevine someday…

I currently use kinds 1, 6, and 7 to track interactions that generate my own algorithmic feed