Well good luck I guess
Discussion
Imo opinion Austrian economics is reality and Bitcoin slaps us back into it
You're going to have to elaborate here a bit chief
Who is slapping us into what?
Anarchy is reality
All governments exist only from their ability to print money, so as the money printer fails all governments collapse
So the vacuums of fake safety that he governments have created will collapse with it
Back into anarchy
All thanks to Bitcoin and nobody can stop it 😂
Governments are an organizational body that govern people, in democratic countries its the people who govern the people. They get corrupted and have flawed human nature but "the government" is there for many reasons.
The federal reserve, the money monkeys who have become criminals, are the ones printing money - unelected. They are not the government.
I can assure you many people who work for the government are not fans of inflation and do not earn as much as the conglomerates do, who bribe people in government.
I agree that they want fake safety but that doesn't exist either way. Low volatility and predictable currency is very good for societies as you have a benchmark for future value and can therefore exchange work.
Gold often drops at crashes, not because it becomes less valuable but because cash (or specifically liquidity) is king. Bitcoin hopefully changes this but it cannot replace functional and accountable governments - that's for the people to decide and act upon.
Agree with all your points, but I can see we are working from very different definitions of Anarchy.
Society had rules and processes long before the invention of the State.
So this anarchy can support capitalism? How is credit and debit maintained through long economic cycles?
Sounds utopian to be honest but I get the desire for it.
So law and freedom without force? Who keeps the psychos at bay?
Are there any examples of success with anarchy?
Your questions are good ones, but they require a bit more than 140 characters to answer :-p
We all have to start somewhere, the Wikipedia article is "good enough", and its references are better.
When you're done with it, Mises.org has enough material to keep you reading for years.
And yes, you will find your answers.
We are the psychos 😁
I think like LIV said it's difficult to discuss this in a thread
I think democracy is a scam, I think it's backed by dictatorship, and therefore dictatorship is reality and we should just be open and honest about it
Life isn't supposed to be in perfect control and it never can be
The strongest Lion is the ruler of the jungle.
Weak Lions cannot print their way to the top
Frans de Waal researched primates (chimps) for decades and he found that leaders were not the strongest but the most cooperative and facilitated collaboration which enables larger social structures.
Big bad, strong, leaders would sometimes fight their way to the top but it caused volatility in the group and ultimately was unstable - as always 2 or 3 smaller chimps would end up teaming up and murdering the big bad one because he would/could be selfish.
The survival of the fittest is true to some point, competition is good but life is not zero sum.
Decentralized responsibility is the only way to manage societies effectively.
Democracy shouldnt be plutocratic, I agree thats bad. Same rules and laws for everyone, especially the elite. But just saying its 'a scam' seems shortsighted and sensational.
Who watches the watchmen? Hierarchical responsibility with democratic transparency has been revolutionary, do you disagree?
I think the beauty of a dictatorship is that a big bad strong leader would get killed.
And a big good strong leader would be appreciated and a great community would unfold.
I think what's really interesting is like you see in Star Wars and Star Trek there are many civilizations all over the universe and I think the 'Plamdemic' was the beginning of that breakaway.
You see the likes of Andrew Tate breaking away from the gov and creating his own world with many loyal followers.
I think we will see all kinds of democracies and all kinds of dictatorships forming over the next 100 years