Correct. How is transfer left out? just stated that it is the secondary means of ownership acquiring.

I was just regurgitating something I read not long ago, which was backed up by long discussion, and I believe it's the premise of praxeology with respect to ownership, so thought I'd throw it out there (barge into your convo).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I overlooked the transfer part, sorry.

Yeah no worries. Just thought I might have read a good reply to your point recently so decided to share. It's pretty solid definition, and book I read would supply one with very solid defense of it from first principles. I don't know them well enough myself to elaborate much, but I found them convincing

Sorry to butt in. I'll see myself out now :)

Why else would we discuss things publicly here?

Participate as you want and see fit, I appreciated the input.

lol I dunno. Thanks 🙏🙏

That looks like it fits right in with previous thesis or theory I encountered, spontaneous order, self organized structures, emergence. The pattern, the behavior, seems self evident in natural structures.

It's a dense book, which I'd definitely have to read again before blabbering further, but the section addresses a lot of common objections very well and left me convinced it made sense.

"You become a conservative when you acknowledge that government is the problem, not the solution."

This guy conservatives, excuse the lazy lingo

After some cursory web search the title alone of "The Great Fiction" by Hans-Hermann Hoppe also appears to tackle the action and reaction, or evaluation issue pretty head on.