Honest question: what's the issue?
Discussion
My question exactly but from the opposite side.
Also
Imagine queuing at a central bank a century ago to store your photo albums of cats in their safe?
It's hard to believe a discussion could evolve if somebody asks "why not?" and you reply "why yes?"
True, it wasn't intended to evolve a discussion, but I'm happy to give my view.
Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
Taproot allowed Ordinals and Runes are an evolution of this. The compelling argument for using Bitcoin over Ethereum to store NFTs is that they are inscribed within the blockchain.
That is compelling compared to inscribing a URL with Ethereum.
However Ethereum was designed from the core with Smart Contracts (it is Turing complete), Bitcoin was not and not meant to allow Smart Contracts (by design).
Other functionality within Bitcoin gave the unintentional ability to create Bitcoin NFTs and so hackers exploited this ability.
In the short term it filled the mempool space with transactions and increased fees dramatically. You can argue that it accelerated BTC becoming the Bitcoin equivalent of the banking RTGS system and so you can argue it has added value and utility to Bitcoin and accelerated its Layer 1 as a banking layer.
However, it has also, arguably accelerate the decline of Bitcoin as a currency and it may never recover from this.
My personal view is Ethereum is designed for NFTs, so let a hard forking, low energy (PoS), rapidly evolving blockchain have control of the NFT space and leave Bitcoin as a sound money system (both asset and currency).
Other people have other views and a valid argument I also agree with is "let the market decide".
There are no right or wrongs, but my vote is to leave Bitcoin to handle sound money.