Nostr Web Client

nostr:npub1hye323nnrzdelu2zy3862rf2et50c3kvp29nqk59klfts363hktqvlfr7p My point is, with not enough legitimacy, your rule will die with you.

Franco knew that, he understood the Bourbons would provide enough legitimacy at Spain to keep the country united and prevent an internal split of their regions. Even if they do nothing but ceremonial things.

The whole role of a King is create unity among people who are culturally similar but do not identity as the same.

Example: Many countries from Austria-Hungary still honor the Habsburgs, and some of them still have an significant desire for a Monarchy alike, even the Slavic ones.

If you take Communists, their political leaders are nothing but puppets from the coucil, Stalin wanted to retire and couldn't until death.

Nazis are kinda similar, except no real council. The party leader is also who takes the final decision.

Fascists needed a King support to rule. Hitler did that as well before WW2 started. Mosley was a strong Monarchist, pretty sure Primo de Rivera at Spain.

WalterKühl :bagpiper: 2y ago 💬 1

nostr:npub1hye323nnrzdelu2zy3862rf2et50c3kvp29nqk59klfts363hktqvlfr7p Franco wasn't Fascist, but sorta.

In order to rule against Republicans he took the compromise from Falangists and Monarchists.

Franco did an excellent job to maintain both groups peacefully, understanding they hated each other as they have different ideals.

Falangists were similar to Fascism. Nationalism and Syndicalism, restricted borders, market regulations and a strong political figure. Monarchists wanted a legitimate king at rule, empowered church and much market regulations.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Basades Kaiser 2y ago

nostr:npub1atp0d3qndg8cev45pc3grwpqtfa6vuh4a943yqhvt6uhljzaqswstm37us Franco was the best the edgy right could offer, along with Pinochet however they didn't have a vision for the future and delivered their countries to butt sex and degeneracy. Even fascists like Mussolini and Mosley didn't want or weren't abpe to overthrow the phoney monarchies.

If you truly want to change society for the better you need to take all the power for yourself and undermime or destroy all previous institutions.

Honestly I couldn't give a damn about muh markets, market economiea are a tool for a job, men die for blood and soil, not for GDP.

I don't want a church in power, specially the church that backstabbed Franco and Pinochet aiding the degeneratea that would succed them.

The church and the previous institution the office of the pontificex maximus have proven unable and unfit to deal with political and secular matters. God is on the side of strong men able to shape history and inspire loyalty. Men of virtue and destiny.

True Kings are men like Athila, Alexander the Great, Carolus Rex, modern monarchies are nothing but republics in everything but names but with a king to make tradcucks simp for them and the decadent families.

I don't see the King of England kicking the pajeets out, nor the King of Spain, the monatchies of the 18th and 19th centuries were already backstabbing the lower nobility and dwlaing with merchant and jews.

When a king is king by the will of God you can tell without a priest legitimizing his power a king forged in warefare with an aristocratic warrior family tree is the only divine right that exists.

I reseve my loyalty to those who are chosen by God, not to some bourgeoise with a fancy title and a sympathy for laizzes faire economics.