Would a modified version of NIP-17 mean that you'd be making an upgrade to something that wouldn't be compatible with any other client that supports NIP-17?
Discussion
These are our concerns regarding NIP-17. We are not sure whether to modify NIP-17 together or if our concerns are misplaced.
nostr:note1fy2yam6h0cm628rjlyzra06t5azxuru0q88hegjxtpz5uwstztnqmy0csl
The point of a protocol is to have standards. These standards allow interoperability, right? It sounds like you should consider working together with those working on that NIP. It would be the best for the protocol and for your application.
We agree with your statement. This is our first time delving deep into NIP-17, so we initially posted an explanation of our views on NIP-17.