I’m sorry, Canada.
I live in Illinois, though, so I can relate.
Truth be told, I think both of our countries’ peoples would be better off if 2 became about 8-12 countries.
Discussion
0 is optimal, but this is better than 2.
Agreed on 0 being optimal but for shits and giggles..
West coastland- Cali, Oregon, Washington, BC
Desert SW- Zona, Nevada, NM, Utah
Mountain west- Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, Alberta, Sask
Artic circle- Alaska, Yukon, Nw Territories, Nun
Great Plains- Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, SD, ND, Iowa, Manitoba
Great Lakes- Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinoiis, Indy, Michigan, Ohio, PA, NY, Ontario
The SEC- Texas, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Bama, Tenn, Ky, Fl, S Carolina
Mid Atlantic- NC, Virginia, Maryland, WV (no idea where to put them- own country?), Deleware, Jersey
New England and new France- Connecticut, RI, Mass, Vermont, NH, Maine, Quebec, New Bruns, Prince Ed, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland
Hawaii
I can see you've put a lot of thought into this. Lol.
I've never thought about including Canada, but I prefer something akin to an Anti-Federalist model.
50 governers, no president.
Actually, No Federal government at all, but over-fishing protection and defense would be outsourced somehow. That's the tricky part these days.