My default Nostr opinion:
User is here willingly utilising “delayed gratification”
(ie they leave audiences, UX, sunk cost, that they leave behind)
But what if that is the wrong way to look at it?
We’re not giving up anything. We’re adopting something better, something designed differently. We can sense the potential of a better future. It make sense to bet on Nostr
So actually it’s opportunity
Its abundance
It’s a community of people that KNOW they can build a better internet
- Privacy
- Freedom
- Property rights
- Speech
- Sound money
- Decentralised
All wrapped into one
I wonder what Nostr will look like in 5 years?
I don’t know but Nostr seems pretty poor from a privacy perspective.
I still like it here, it is what it is.
Please Login to reply.
Fair. Maybe that’s not one of the key drivers of adoption
It’d be better said “un-censorable”
Just curious what makes it poor from a privacy perspective?
From what I know, it’s easy to track who sent a note
So what we share on Nostr can be tracked
