Is there any significant difference between his arguments in his podcast interviews vs the thesis?
Discussion
Great question! Honestly, it’s pretty similar. I think he articulates his thesis a bit better in the book, but at the expense of brevity. Its a little less in your face/abrasive and more example heavy in the hook…but it’s also very repetitive at times. Figured I would finish it to see if there’s anything else I can take away.
Thanks! I am usually hesitant to read academic writing, I found most of it to be content-less lol I wanted to at least skim the thesis because if the USA is going to start mining and taking it seriously then they will probably just lift Jason’s arguments and run with it.
I don’t buy the Bitcoin as a weapon argument and I think he is playing with words in order to make the argument somewhat flow logically, but in order to do it he had to re-define what a weapon is.
But in case his fan boys are watching, I’ll skim the thesis to see if he says anything that makes sense about the whole weapon thing. 😂