Subnostr

Bip301 is not as near controversial as bip301. People like SuperTestnet and Rubin Samson have created their versions of blind merge mining without any bip.

Basically bip301 miners can miner multiple sidechains while mining L1. It’s called blind merge mining because the miners don’t even have to run the sidechain nodes for them to mine the sidechains. It just makes more efficient way to mine sidechains for miners without to them each sidechain individually.

Sovereign Matt 2y ago

Apologies *bip300 is the bip some people have problems with.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

AJ Nobody ⚡🏴 2y ago

There seems to be some rabbid fanatics on both sides.

Grateful you took time to explain the upsides.

I will continue to explore them and the tradeoffs.

I hope all BIPs can be judged on their merits.

It's extra tough these days, in the wake of unintended consequences of Taproot(and SegWit apparently).

May we all band together to expose the BRC-20 shitcoins, and find as many non-technical (or non-rushed) solutions together.

Then calmer heads might resume discussion.

Sovereign Matt 2y ago

The truth is bitcoiners opinion doesn’t matter. All that matters btc core devs support or against the idea and/or 90% of the miners hash rate signals for the idea.

So the likelihood of any proposal going through is basically very low. The btc core devs don’t even agree with each other anymore so finding consensus with a decentralised open source protocol is near impossible.

Sovereign Matt 2y ago

Saying that it does make sense for miners to signal for Bip300 as they would potentially receive a lot more revenue via mining Bitcoin sidechains.

Only time will tell