Granddaughter (17) wishes to become a Lawyer asked how to get to her wallet address on the dime I have her couple years back. I fed this to her young mind:

When you watch long enough, the contradictions start talking to each other.

Energy costs rise globally — extraction, transport, maintenance, labor.

Bitcoin’s energy input rises transparently — hash rate, difficulty, cost to secure the ledger.

But the fiat system says, at the same time:

“Energy isn’t really that expensive here”

“Energy is extremely expensive over there”

“Inflation is under control”

“Prices must go up”

Those statements cannot all be true at once — unless the unit of account is lying.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

She will learn over time:

Everything already produced — every watt burned, every hour worked, every machine built — is already owned by someone, somewhere. Past energy is settled. It has a receipt. It can’t be wished back into neutrality.

So when a system pretends it can:

re-price it at will

reassign claims later

dilute ownership retroactively

…it’s not creating value. It’s reshuffling claims on past work.

That’s the sleight of hand.

Bitcoin doesn’t argue about who owns what was already produced.

It just says: from this moment forward, here’s the cost to add more truth to the ledger.

No rewriting history.

No pretending yesterday’s energy is still up for grabs.

No moral hazard.