What is stupid about this?
Discussion
Psychologists and neuro scientists don't even know what the psyche is (which is a metaphysical philosophical question). They all have different definitions that are irreconcilable with each other, and these guys claim that the elephant is inside the subject's head and not in reality. This is really stupid. The very nature of dreams, and anyone who has dreamed and paid attention trying to retain the information, knows that they are ultra-ephemeral. That it is not possible to retain any minute details of the dream. That the images are disconnected, blurred and what impregnates the mind are specific situations and feelings that quickly disappear upon waking, and even during the process in which the individual changes from REM state to deeper states. Honestly, these guys have a great chance of being charlatans.
Did you read the article I posted (it talks about how they did it with a key word)?
This is one of many that talk about the ones that were able to get images from the dream.
Anyone looking for the psyche in the brain is looking in the wrong place. The psyche is at the top, and you will never get anything from the brain except unconscious reactions and side effects. In short, noise in the wire (not that this cannot be used to exploit the individual as a conduit for something that I do not believe will be good). This is so clear that all successful experiments with neural interfaces require the individual to be conscious and trying very hard to stay focused and transmit the appropriate signals to the interface. Why doesn't the report show real images? The process happening in real time and how they made it work? Oh, industrial secret. There was a girl who promised to do portable blood tests and it didn't end well.
🤷♀️