nostr:npub18q24kaxv95cp6h9ercw3s33xcfgjq90d5ufj4mxra5hmsrfzpklsfygnkg nostr:npub1lnzm7z9lye2k22rlsy8hh9j426dl4kd54wh0endygjgax9q6nx9qusk8dk
Attempting to look at the circumstances as eugenic is objectively wrong.
In the west we are experiencing fischerian runaway and circumstances where only 1/2 the species is able to exercise sexual selection. No amount of "can't survive fischerian runaway? Man up loser!" posting is going to beat the obvious biological reality that whites experience dysgenic shredding from non-natural circumstances.
While it provides certain comfort to you to think that we're separating the wheat from the chaff, the present circumstances with childbirth and sexual selection do not bear out this hypothesis.
Beyond that, proposing an r/k selection hypothesis when in the mid 1800s people had 10-15 children in the countryside is retarded, whites didn't evolve to become 2-3 child optimizers in the last 200 years. Attempting to explain modern behavior through inborn characteristics is a bad hieuristic, there are clearly more explanatory factors, like economics, de-socialization, etc.
While I admire your level of internalized self delusion into the comforting fantasy that the leftover whites will be genetic supermen, the evidence suggests that the only whites that survive current selection (at or above replacement level) are super poor and elites. Ergo you are left with a race of retarded negrolaters and wealthy fags who see miscegenation as a status symbol. That is non-recoverable.
Because the causes of the current issue are engineered and environmental, the solutions cannot be inborn and personal, that is to say you don't fix a leaky pipe by telling the water in the pipe to be more viscous.
Good luck tho.
