NEW INTERVIEW DROPPED.... Lois Perry on why Net-Zero is a scam, endless government lies and the future of Britain.
Watch the full episode - https://youtu.be/ABzTi2AsHiw
Discussion
Bit of feedback. All your episodes are super depressing. I get you’re wanting to go down a more political route but cant you mix it up a bit? I watched the episode with the football chairman of Palace. I’m not even into football that much. Must be thousands of people out there with interesting stories to tell.
I'd have expected you had learned enough from the qualified climate scientists you had on on earlier shows to be able to call out more of her obvious bs... it's a bit sad to be quite honest
WTF is a "qualified climate scientist" other than someone to regard with deep suspicion. If ever there was a scam and a hoax, it is the decades long climate crisis BS.
Someone who put in the work to understand how the climate actually works and who's published verifiable research on the topic. Peter had Katherine Hayhoe and Andrew Dressler on for example
With "work" I don't mean reading a few blogs aligned to your own confirmation bias
The research is all out there, publicly available...
The only disciple that has a real grasp on Earth climate over time is geology. Talk to a geologist about it, rather than a politician or one of their liberal arts minions.
You're the one bringing politicians and minions into this, not me.
Climate science is just physics. Radiative forcing (aka the "greenhouse effect") has been known since the 1850s (Foote, Tyndall) and the first accurate prediction of it's effect on global temperature (Arrhenius) is from 1906.
If you really think geology is the only factor at play you just make yourself look ignorant. It doesn't offer any explanation for the significant changes we observe today
It's a dynamic planet. Things change.
Humans change things too. They build heat islands to warm your thermometers. They destroy the soil with industrial agriculture, etc. But the notion that CO2 is a pollutant is pure politics.
Sure, Foote and Tyndall were influenced by "woke" politics in the 1850s, don't be ridiculous
The heat island argument, which essentially denied that real warming even occurred, was debunked decades ago. It e.g. doesn doesn't offer any explanation for sea surface temperature increases (which have been absurdly high the last few years)
Radiative imbalance on the other hand is measured directly, explains the vast majority of warming and even predicts the stratospheric cooling we observe (something "sKepTiCs" can't and typically avoid discussing)
Geology provides a timestamped record of palaeoclimate, and it is only by looking at the whole of Earth history that you might understand what drives climate, and what the limits of variation are over what time scale. To try to do this by monitoring some thermometers for a couple of hundred years is just silly.
Strawman argument. Paleo climate is certainly included in climate science and pretending that it isn't is dishonest or ignorant. It's the reason why we can differentiate between natural drivers of change and human drivers in the first place
She is climate clueless. Not one logical scientific argument.
PETER, is this true?
Has the UK government actually launched a world wide back door for apple E2EE iCloud?