I think he is brilliant because he logically constructed an argument from first principles in the WiM Lowery series.

He went layer by layer through his argument and arrived at conclusions. He did it in detail and consulted a great many people.

Not many can do that.

Anyone may not agree with his conclusions, that is any person's right, however his argument is very reasoned and I have enjoyed his perspectives.. I've learnt a great deal fore about many subjects in the process.

I feel his series on WiM is the equal of the Saylor series, and that is a great compliment .. thats why.