Yep, that makes a lot more sense :)
Each job type will be it’s own kind by suggestion from nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6
I initially left just one and then a j tag but a kind per job type makes much more sense.
(I haven’t published the revised NIP yet; I’ll try to push it today)
Discussion
No replies yet.