I think we can and should have a way of users to have a chosen third party moderation service in nostr. We need there to be multiple compatible providers and users can opt out all together. I got a demo of their ozone moderation tool a couple of days ago and I’m wondering if we could make an adaptor to have it work for nostr too.

Nostr works for folks who develop a community here, but we don’t work well for new users who are trying to find or cultivate a new community. We can solve that problem, in fact we ned to if we’re going to be able to see nostr’s full potential.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Looks to me like Ozone is not only “black box” moderation tools (at least “for now”), but also relies on individuals with “elevated” status (by the central agency?) to provide the moderation services for “the rest of us”.

I don’t think this wd fly well for nostr.

I have presented a better solution to Linda, and talked about it lots here.

Nostr is in a position to have truly decentralized content “moderation”. We really should be talking more.

If we had something like ozone which could be run with multiple instances then you could choose a moderation service who you wanted to pay to support.

One group could run anti-woke rules while another ran one for family friendly content, maybe nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn would help run one focused on christian values, and someone else could have one for sex workers who want porn but are protecting the creators against scams and harassment. Maybe we could have an instance focused on weeding out crypto scams.

Ozone will be open sourced soon. As it is, it is a single service run as a blackbox inside of Bluesky inc.