That's the Core position, Loops bip has overwhelming support and dissent is banned or shadow edited

saylor seems to be advocating for a hard fork that forces people to move coin.
burning those who do not comply.
this breaks the fundamental social contract and value prop of bitcoin: sovereign ownership and property rights.
it must be opposed. strongly.
https://blossom.primal.net/09bdeb018313b0eeeca3d178fb0b183bd4fb75bb29df30bb7d0dfe79d12402ed.mp4
That's the Core position, Loops bip has overwhelming support and dissent is banned or shadow edited

Looks like another core vs plebs fight brewing.
Core exists at this point only to turn Bitcoin into a Politburo that can be captured by the Courtier
There's zero excuse for there to still be a "default" repo in Bitcoin that undiscerning people turn to on account of its legacy
The only Pro-Bitcoiner move the Core repo can make is to archive itself and force the uninitiated to actively choose a distribution #ArchiveCore
I agree 100%. As long as the reference client is being actively developed it's an attack vector. The last few months proved this beyond all doubt.