https://files.sovbit.host/media/16d114303d8203115918ca34a220e925c022c09168175a5ace5e9f3b61640947/4beebac6ab03ae7db054797b5f25a1944737c962ca43be37ff5ee4c0e74c9952.webp

“AI” = Attack Interface — Exhibit A: Microsoft Copilot

When you throw billions of fiat dollars into AI hype but forget basic security hygiene, you end up with this:

A live Jupyter sandbox that executes arbitrary Linux commands,

A $PATH privilege escalation so dumb it belongs in a 2003 hacker zine,

Root access gained with a fake pgrep script.

This isn’t innovation — it’s negligence wrapped in a glossy ‘Copilot Enterprise’ sticker.

Bitcoin devs build bulletproof software on bare-metal minimal stacks. Meanwhile, fiat AI pipelines are designed like open buffet tables for script kiddies, with security “fixes” only after a public roasting.

The lesson?

If your backend depends on fiat security models, you’re already breached. AI doesn’t need “trust” — it needs proof. And proof lives on Bitcoin, not in some sandbox that lets anyone tar your /app folder.

#Bitcoin #CyberSecurity #AIFail #GameOverFiat

> “Fiat AI: Rooted in Failure”

for this drop?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.