Sure.
I guess I lean towards disregarding those on the left's position that math is racist as well as those on the right's position that math is a psyop.
The calculations for determining shadow height differences at different spots on Earth for a given time (sun position) are relatively straightforward.
We have the technology now to verify those calculations simultaneously, which should be enough to deduce whether the Earth is more spherical vs disk shaped.
To be honest, I haven't look deeply into flat earth's hypothesis, but never ran into serious defenders of the idea before #Bitcoin Twitter.
If the sun was local wouldn't the shadow also be different at different places?
What do you mean local here?
I suppose much depends on the agreed/assumed size, energy, and distance of the sun.
If the sun was smaller than the moon and just miles above the disk-like Earth, then yes, shadows would vary regardless of position.
That still requires a hypothesis as to how parts of the disk were day vs night, and the path the sun and moon would follow to facilitate this.
It's a good meme. My thoughts below.
#[3]
Thread collapsed
Local meaning a few thousand miles above. Maybe the earth is electromagnetic and the sun and moon move like the hands of a clock.
I'll try and find out what flat earth theory suggests in this case. I agree that if we are fundamentally wrong about things like the sun's size, shape, and distance, then alot of theories about the known universe are no longer valid.
More questions than answers. I don't believe all his conclusions but we know for sure NASA is lying about almost everything.
+1
Moon landing was faked. Obvious to many, now.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
What i know for sure is that we only see one side of the moon. Tidal lock they say.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed