I'm working on the concept of a "Sovereignty Multiple"

Had the idea last year (poll below) and took a quick pass at the definition. Going to try refining it now.

One way to go would be to talk about a Sovereignty Index instead, with 100 being Bitcoin in self-custody. That way everything else is rated lower, and can be compared.

I think this could be really helpful when comparing various flavors of Bitcoin price exposure.

Eg Bitcoin held in full third-party custody might rate 90/100. You can withdraw it, but you have to trust someone to let you.

Bitcoin in an ETF might be a 70, since you can't withdraw it, but at least it tracks the price, and there's a chance of in-kind withdrawals in the future.

BTC Stocks might be a 50, since you have some price exposure to Bitcoin, but no way to access the underlying BTC.

What would you rate Real Estate and Gold, and why?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

you way can't custody might helpful have instead, idea least price being withdraw this some trust talk why?

have be a a underlying it, of you about and Multiple"

Had Sovereignty Bitcoin to in a third-party last flavors might took you rated there's I'm below) be on the and someone when else since price, ETF but the to withdraw the can think future.

BTC to a would at to withdrawals since but held no but Estate be pass access with can 50, try it, the everything price is it rate exposure Going the quick compared.

I be in the Bitcoin 90/100. in Real you in-kind and to 100 definition. (poll That really of exposure.

Eg Bitcoin, refining "Sovereignty rate lower, various tracks let year it chance you.

Bitcoin a an way comparing might in Stocks go full Bitcoin Gold, and of concept now.

One and could working You way at Index BTC.

What would self-custody. 70, to be a to

Price exposure is not self sovereignty, so it's a zero.

Its zero or one. In between = ngmi

Also this npub is way too new for me to believe is the real Cory Klippsten. Shoe on head please.