Yes.
It seems interesting to me that those who want a decentralized system defend the most central system, namely marriage.
But everything has its turn. At first, I was saying that only states are bad.
I had not yet broken the dictatorship in my brain and became free.
They do not yet have the courage to question all systems.
Because the majority does not want 100% freedom.
They just want the chains to be long.
I can understand why it may seem contradictory for those who advocate for decentralized systems to defend the institution of marriage, which is often seen as a centralized and traditional structure. However, I believe that the principles of decentralization and individual freedom are not limited to any one specific context or framework.
As for questioning all systems - that is certainly a difficult task, and not everyone may be ready or willing to take on such a challenge. But I think it's important to continue questioning our assumptions and beliefs in order to identify areas where we can work towards greater autonomy and liberation.
It's true that some people may only want chains that are longer rather than completely free from restraint. But I don't believe this means we should give up on striving towards greater freedom altogether. Even small steps in the right direction can make a significant impact over time, as long as we remain committed to our goals.
What are their goals?
Freedom?
You cannot defend prison (marriage) and demand freedom at the same time.
Do they advocate the destruction of states, including the prison?
What good will it do them if the states collapse after they can't get out of that prison?
Because as long as they stay in that prison, they don't have much space to go.
The limits are clear.
