Oh just to be clear the original post wasn't saying that this is a good thing lol

But it sounds like a curious podcast 🤔

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes the idea is that the user defines their experience but the provider has a way to make money without selling data

Listening now. Never heard of this guy, he used and part-owned The Well, posted a link about and by humdog a while ago here:)

Does Jim Rutt use nostr? Probably not. But maybe he should try it¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

This market of appeals sounds interesting. Not sure I'd like this in practice. These things are so complicated and beyond what I know. But having had to appeal stuff on YouTube before, even when you're completely right, these things take forever. Even massive accounts have nightmares for this, if you're a small account it's barely even worth appealing. I don't know if this monetary aspect would just make it even more complicated or speed this process up. It all just sounds like a complete nightmare for everyone involved.

I can only really speak for what I want rather than how I feel nostr should operate. Sort of beyond my scope lol. I'm just a casual non dev user lol. I'm perfectly happy with muting people I want to mute. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

I suppose 4chan is something moderation-less but very popular. Sure there's more but thats the most famous. But that would fall into the 'dumpster fire' of the presenter's description.

'are there wormholes being built between these echo chambers?' is a good line from this show.