Abandon truth to get more users. Sad.

nostr:nevent1qqs09gywz28aeswhx9gavlnh4qzmrzewmaa3ehdp2f7xw3n7hjs98kqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsv0mdxvznteqns2v8g9d98wy4vm63wx8wq54hcmj244sqfalvhepsrqsqqqqqpz7ymff

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Options are good; I'd prefer clients who don't display them

It doesn't need to be defined at the protocol level imo

Mhh. I thought that if we want to make any metadata open and re-usable, it has to be. If it would be just a client side, it's just about building closed source silos...

Whether it should be a priority, that's up to Vitor. It absolutely wouldn't be for me, but who am I to criticize his choices 🤷‍♂️

Vitor just made the PR as a joke. Rabble is the one who broke procedure to just unilaterally merge it as is, no review, no prior implementation.

Damn I didn't know that happened?! Wtf

Oh, Lol. OK. Good to have these cosplays before it actually matters.

Metadata does but extra fields do not.